Brazil vs Canada: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Brazil
0.0436 ha per person
in 2024
Canada
0.0368 ha per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
14th
Canada rank
15th
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Canada
How they compare
Brazil currently reports 0.0436 ha per person against 0.0368 ha per person in Canada, a difference of 0.0068 ha per person.
That makes Brazil's figure about 1.2 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 14th and Canada ranks 15th of 188 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0497 ha per person | 0.0135 ha per person | 0.0362 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2000s | 0.0443 ha per person | 0.0144 ha per person | 0.0299 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0.044 ha per person | 0.0188 ha per person | 0.0252 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.0344 ha per person | 0.0342 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Brazil or Canada?
- Brazil, at 0.0436 ha per person against 0.0368 ha per person in Canada as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Brazil and Canada?
- 0.0068 ha per person, with Brazil ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Canada?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Canada rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 14th and Canada ranks 15th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.