Brazil vs Guyana: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Brazil
0.0436 ha per person
in 2024
Guyana
0.0872 ha per person
in 2024
Brazil rank
14th
Guyana rank
11th
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Brazil
- Guyana
How they compare
Guyana currently reports 0.0872 ha per person against 0.0436 ha per person in Brazil, a difference of 0.0436 ha per person.
That makes Guyana's figure about 2.0 times Brazil's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Brazil ahead.
Brazil ranks 14th and Guyana ranks 11th of 188 countries.
Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brazil | Guyana | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0497 ha per person | 0.0098 ha per person | 0.0399 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2000s | 0.0443 ha per person | 0.0102 ha per person | 0.0341 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2010s | 0.044 ha per person | 0.0123 ha per person | 0.0317 ha per person | Brazil |
| 2020s | 0.0344 ha per person | 0.0273 ha per person | 0.0072 ha per person | Brazil |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Brazil or Guyana?
- Guyana, at 0.0872 ha per person against 0.0436 ha per person in Brazil as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Brazil and Guyana?
- 0.0436 ha per person, with Guyana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Guyana?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Brazil and Guyana rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Brazil ranks 14th and Guyana ranks 11th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.