Chad vs Zimbabwe: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Chad
0.0111 ha per person
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0.0113 ha per person
in 2024
Chad rank
33rd
Zimbabwe rank
32nd
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Chad
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0.0113 ha per person against 0.0111 ha per person in Chad, a difference of 0.0002 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chad ahead.
Chad ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 188 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.4128 ha per person | 0.1521 ha per person | 0.2607 ha per person | Chad |
| 2000s | 0.1489 ha per person | 0.0458 ha per person | 0.1031 ha per person | Chad |
| 2010s | 0.0382 ha per person | 0.0328 ha per person | 0.0054 ha per person | Chad |
| 2020s | 0.0169 ha per person | 0.0116 ha per person | 0.0053 ha per person | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Chad or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0.0113 ha per person against 0.0111 ha per person in Chad as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Chad and Zimbabwe?
- 0.0002 ha per person, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chad and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Chad ranks 33rd and Zimbabwe ranks 32nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.