Chile vs Costa Rica: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Chile
0.0009 ha per person
in 2024
Costa Rica
0.0009 ha per person
in 2024
Chile rank
64th
Costa Rica rank
65th
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Chile
- Costa Rica
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0009 ha per person against 0.0009 ha per person in Costa Rica, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Chile ranks 64th and Costa Rica ranks 65th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Costa Rica in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Costa Rica | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0014 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 0.0016 ha per person | 0.0014 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Chile |
| 2020s | 0.001 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Chile or Costa Rica?
- Chile, at 0.0009 ha per person against 0.0009 ha per person in Costa Rica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Chile and Costa Rica?
- 0 ha per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Costa Rica rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Chile ranks 64th and Costa Rica ranks 65th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.