Chile vs Thailand: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Chile
0.0009 ha per person
in 2024
Thailand
0.0009 ha per person
in 2024
Chile rank
64th
Thailand rank
66th
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Chile
- Thailand
How they compare
Chile currently reports 0.0009 ha per person against 0.0009 ha per person in Thailand, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Thailand's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Thailand ahead.
Chile ranks 64th and Thailand ranks 66th of 188 countries.
Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0018 ha per person | 0.0011 ha per person | Thailand |
| 2000s | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0032 ha per person | 0.0027 ha per person | Thailand |
| 2010s | 0.0016 ha per person | 0.002 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | Thailand |
| 2020s | 0.001 ha per person | 0.0011 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Thailand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Chile or Thailand?
- Chile, at 0.0009 ha per person against 0.0009 ha per person in Thailand as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Chile and Thailand?
- 0 ha per person, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Thailand?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Thailand rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Chile ranks 64th and Thailand ranks 66th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.