Chile vs Uruguay: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Chile
0.0009 ha per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0.001 ha per person
in 2024
Chile rank
64th
Uruguay rank
63rd
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Chile
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 0.001 ha per person against 0.0009 ha per person in Chile, a difference of 0.0001 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uruguay ahead.
Chile ranks 64th and Uruguay ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0018 ha per person | 0.0011 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0041 ha per person | 0.0036 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.0016 ha per person | 0.0022 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.001 ha per person | 0.003 ha per person | 0.002 ha per person | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Chile or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 0.001 ha per person against 0.0009 ha per person in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Chile and Uruguay?
- 0.0001 ha per person, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Uruguay?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Uruguay rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Chile ranks 64th and Uruguay ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.