Cuba vs Myanmar: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Cuba
0.0043 ha per person
in 2024
Myanmar
0.005 ha per person
in 2024
Cuba rank
40th
Myanmar rank
37th
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Cuba
- Myanmar
How they compare
Myanmar currently reports 0.005 ha per person against 0.0043 ha per person in Cuba, a difference of 0.0007 ha per person.
That makes Myanmar's figure about 1.2 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Myanmar ahead.
Cuba ranks 40th and Myanmar ranks 37th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Myanmar in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0024 ha per person | 0.0037 ha per person | 0.0013 ha per person | Myanmar |
| 2000s | 0.0048 ha per person | 0.0051 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Myanmar |
| 2010s | 0.0033 ha per person | 0.0058 ha per person | 0.0025 ha per person | Myanmar |
| 2020s | 0.0056 ha per person | 0.0045 ha per person | 0.0011 ha per person | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Cuba or Myanmar?
- Myanmar, at 0.005 ha per person against 0.0043 ha per person in Cuba as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Cuba and Myanmar?
- 0.0007 ha per person, with Myanmar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Myanmar?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Cuba and Myanmar rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Cuba ranks 40th and Myanmar ranks 37th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.