Egypt vs Puerto Rico: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Egypt
0 ha per person
in 2024
Puerto Rico
0 ha per person
in 2024
Egypt rank
110th
Puerto Rico rank
113th
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Egypt
- Puerto Rico
How they compare
Egypt currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Puerto Rico, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Puerto Rico ahead.
Egypt ranks 110th and Puerto Rico ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 1 and Puerto Rico in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Puerto Rico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Puerto Rico |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Puerto Rico |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Egypt |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Puerto Rico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Egypt or Puerto Rico?
- Egypt, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Puerto Rico as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Egypt and Puerto Rico?
- 0 ha per person, with Egypt ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Puerto Rico?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Egypt and Puerto Rico rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Egypt ranks 110th and Puerto Rico ranks 113th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.