Germany vs Switzerland: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Germany
0 ha per person
in 2024
Switzerland
0 ha per person
in 2024
Germany rank
111th
Switzerland rank
113th
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Germany
- Switzerland
How they compare
Germany currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Switzerland, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Switzerland ahead.
Germany ranks 111th and Switzerland ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 2 and Switzerland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Germany | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Switzerland |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Germany |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Switzerland |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Germany |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Germany or Switzerland?
- Germany, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Switzerland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Germany and Switzerland?
- 0 ha per person, with Germany ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Switzerland?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Germany and Switzerland rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Germany ranks 111th and Switzerland ranks 113th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.