Jamaica vs Sri Lanka: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Jamaica
0 ha per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka
0 ha per person
in 2024
Jamaica rank
100th
Sri Lanka rank
99th
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Jamaica
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Jamaica, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Jamaica ranks 100th and Sri Lanka ranks 99th of 188 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jamaica | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0006 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.0013 ha per person | 0.0013 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Jamaica or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Jamaica as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Jamaica and Sri Lanka?
- 0 ha per person, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Sri Lanka?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Jamaica and Sri Lanka rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Jamaica ranks 100th and Sri Lanka ranks 99th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.