Kazakhstan vs New Zealand: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Kazakhstan
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
New Zealand
0.0001 ha per person
in 2024
Kazakhstan rank
84th
New Zealand rank
83rd
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Kazakhstan
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Kazakhstan ahead.
Kazakhstan ranks 84th and New Zealand ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
Kazakhstan has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kazakhstan | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2000s | 0.0011 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.001 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2010s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
| 2020s | 0.0008 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Kazakhstan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Kazakhstan or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 0.0001 ha per person against 0.0001 ha per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Kazakhstan and New Zealand?
- 0 ha per person, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and New Zealand?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Kazakhstan and New Zealand rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Kazakhstan ranks 84th and New Zealand ranks 83rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.