Lithuania vs Tajikistan: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Lithuania
0 ha per person
in 2024
Tajikistan
0 ha per person
in 2024
Lithuania rank
113th
Tajikistan rank
113th
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Lithuania
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Tajikistan, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 113th and Tajikistan ranks 113th of 188 countries.
Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0.0002 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0002 ha per person | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Lithuania or Tajikistan?
- Lithuania, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Tajikistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Lithuania and Tajikistan?
- 0 ha per person, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Tajikistan?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Lithuania and Tajikistan rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Lithuania ranks 113th and Tajikistan ranks 113th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.