Malaysia vs Namibia: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Malaysia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Malaysia rank
93rd
Namibia rank
94th
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Malaysia
- Namibia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
Malaysia ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 94th of 188 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Malaysia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0.915 ha per person | 0.9149 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per person | 0.1762 ha per person | 0.1762 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0 ha per person | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Malaysia or Namibia?
- Malaysia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Malaysia and Namibia?
- 0 ha per person, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Malaysia and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Malaysia and Namibia rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Malaysia ranks 93rd and Namibia ranks 94th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.