Nepal vs Panama: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Nepal
0.0016 ha per person
in 2024
Panama
0.0013 ha per person
in 2024
Nepal rank
57th
Panama rank
59th
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Nepal
- Panama
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0.0016 ha per person against 0.0013 ha per person in Panama, a difference of 0.0003 ha per person.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.2 times Panama's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Panama ahead.
Nepal ranks 57th and Panama ranks 59th of 188 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0041 ha per person | 0.0038 ha per person | Panama |
| 2000s | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0081 ha per person | 0.0079 ha per person | Panama |
| 2010s | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0046 ha per person | 0.0042 ha per person | Panama |
| 2020s | 0.0009 ha per person | 0.002 ha per person | 0.0011 ha per person | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Nepal or Panama?
- Nepal, at 0.0016 ha per person against 0.0013 ha per person in Panama as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Nepal and Panama?
- 0.0003 ha per person, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Panama?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Panama rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Nepal ranks 57th and Panama ranks 59th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.