Panama vs Peru: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Panama
0.0013 ha per person
in 2024
Peru
0.001 ha per person
in 2024
Panama rank
59th
Peru rank
61st
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Panama
- Peru
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0.0013 ha per person against 0.001 ha per person in Peru, a difference of 0.0003 ha per person.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times Peru's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Panama ranks 59th and Peru ranks 61st of 188 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0041 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0038 ha per person | Panama |
| 2000s | 0.0081 ha per person | 0.0003 ha per person | 0.0078 ha per person | Panama |
| 2010s | 0.0046 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0042 ha per person | Panama |
| 2020s | 0.002 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0015 ha per person | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Panama or Peru?
- Panama, at 0.0013 ha per person against 0.001 ha per person in Peru as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Panama and Peru?
- 0.0003 ha per person, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Peru?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Panama and Peru rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Panama ranks 59th and Peru ranks 61st of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.