Panama vs Rwanda: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Panama
0.0013 ha per person
in 2024
Rwanda
0.001 ha per person
in 2024
Panama rank
59th
Rwanda rank
62nd
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Panama
- Rwanda
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0.0013 ha per person against 0.001 ha per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0003 ha per person.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.3 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 59th and Rwanda ranks 62nd of 188 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0041 ha per person | 0.001 ha per person | 0.0032 ha per person | Panama |
| 2000s | 0.0081 ha per person | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0076 ha per person | Panama |
| 2010s | 0.0046 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0042 ha per person | Panama |
| 2020s | 0.002 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.0013 ha per person | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Panama or Rwanda?
- Panama, at 0.0013 ha per person against 0.001 ha per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Panama and Rwanda?
- 0.0003 ha per person, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Panama and Rwanda rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Panama ranks 59th and Rwanda ranks 62nd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.