Rwanda vs Uruguay: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Rwanda
0.001 ha per person
in 2024
Uruguay
0.001 ha per person
in 2024
Rwanda rank
62nd
Uruguay rank
63rd
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Rwanda
- Uruguay
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0.001 ha per person against 0.001 ha per person in Uruguay, a difference of 0 ha per person.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Uruguay ahead.
Rwanda ranks 62nd and Uruguay ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
Uruguay has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Rwanda | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.001 ha per person | 0.0018 ha per person | 0.0009 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 2000s | 0.0005 ha per person | 0.0041 ha per person | 0.0036 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 2010s | 0.0004 ha per person | 0.0022 ha per person | 0.0018 ha per person | Uruguay |
| 2020s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0.003 ha per person | 0.0024 ha per person | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Rwanda or Uruguay?
- Rwanda, at 0.001 ha per person against 0.001 ha per person in Uruguay as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Rwanda and Uruguay?
- 0 ha per person, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Uruguay?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Rwanda and Uruguay rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Rwanda ranks 62nd and Uruguay ranks 63rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.