South Sudan vs Zambia: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
South Sudan
1.35 ha per person
in 2024
Zambia
0.5586 ha per person
in 2024
South Sudan rank
2nd
Zambia rank
3rd
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- South Sudan
- Zambia
How they compare
South Sudan currently reports 1.35 ha per person against 0.5586 ha per person in Zambia, a difference of 0.7914 ha per person.
That makes South Sudan's figure about 2.4 times Zambia's.
Across all 13 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.
South Sudan ranks 2nd and Zambia ranks 3rd of 188 countries.
South Sudan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Sudan | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 1.45 ha per person | 0.7415 ha per person | 0.7073 ha per person | South Sudan |
| 2020s | 1.31 ha per person | 0.5739 ha per person | 0.7355 ha per person | South Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, South Sudan or Zambia?
- South Sudan, at 1.35 ha per person against 0.5586 ha per person in Zambia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between South Sudan and Zambia?
- 0.7914 ha per person, with South Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Sudan and Zambia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do South Sudan and Zambia rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- South Sudan ranks 2nd and Zambia ranks 3rd of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.