Sri Lanka vs Tunisia: Savanna — Burned Area, per capita
Sri Lanka
0 ha per person
in 2024
Tunisia
0 ha per person
in 2024
Sri Lanka rank
99th
Tunisia rank
96th
Savanna — Burned Area, per capita over time
- Sri Lanka
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0 ha per person.
That makes Tunisia's figure about 1.1 times Sri Lanka's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Sri Lanka ranks 99th and Tunisia ranks 96th of 188 countries.
Sri Lanka has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sri Lanka | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0007 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0007 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 0.0013 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0013 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2010s | 0.0004 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0004 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
| 2020s | 0.0001 ha per person | 0 ha per person | 0.0001 ha per person | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per capita, Sri Lanka or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 0 ha per person against 0 ha per person in Sri Lanka as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per capita between Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 0 ha per person, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sri Lanka and Tunisia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Sri Lanka and Tunisia rank globally for savanna — burned area, per capita?
- Sri Lanka ranks 99th and Tunisia ranks 96th of 188 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.