Australia vs Rwanda: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Australia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Rwanda
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Australia rank
37th
Rwanda rank
40th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Australia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Australia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.6 times Rwanda's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.
Australia ranks 37th and Rwanda ranks 40th of 185 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Australia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Australia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Australia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Australia or Rwanda?
- Australia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Australia and Rwanda?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Australia and Rwanda rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Australia ranks 37th and Rwanda ranks 40th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.