Barbados vs Estonia: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Barbados
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Estonia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Barbados rank
112th
Estonia rank
112th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Barbados
- Estonia
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Estonia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Estonia ahead.
Barbados ranks 112th and Estonia ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Estonia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Estonia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Estonia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Barbados or Estonia?
- Barbados, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Estonia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Barbados and Estonia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Estonia?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Estonia rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Barbados ranks 112th and Estonia ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.