Burundi vs Chad: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Burundi
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Chad
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Burundi rank
19th
Chad rank
18th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Burundi
- Chad
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Burundi, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times Burundi's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Burundi ranks 19th and Chad ranks 18th of 185 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0019 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0019 ha per US$ of GDP | Chad |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0006 ha per US$ of GDP | Chad |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Chad |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Burundi or Chad?
- Chad, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Burundi as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Burundi and Chad?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Chad?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Burundi and Chad rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Burundi ranks 19th and Chad ranks 18th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.