Canada vs Cuba: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Canada
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Cuba
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2020
Canada rank
44th
Cuba rank
42nd
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Canada
- Cuba
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Canada, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.3 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Cuba ahead.
Canada ranks 44th and Cuba ranks 42nd of 185 countries.
Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Cuba | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Canada or Cuba?
- Cuba, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Canada as of 2020.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Canada and Cuba?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Cuba?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2020.
- How do Canada and Cuba rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Canada ranks 44th and Cuba ranks 42nd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.