Chad vs Nicaragua: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Chad
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Nicaragua
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2023
Chad rank
18th
Nicaragua rank
20th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Chad
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Chad currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Nicaragua, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Chad's figure about 1.2 times Nicaragua's.
Across all 34 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Chad ranks 18th and Nicaragua ranks 20th of 185 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chad | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0019 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0019 ha per US$ of GDP | Chad |
| 2000s | 0.0007 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0007 ha per US$ of GDP | Chad |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Chad |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Chad or Nicaragua?
- Chad, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Nicaragua as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Chad and Nicaragua?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Chad ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Nicaragua?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2023.
- How do Chad and Nicaragua rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Chad ranks 18th and Nicaragua ranks 20th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.