Chile vs Panama: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Chile
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Panama
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Chile rank
68th
Panama rank
67th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Chile
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Panama ahead.
Chile ranks 68th and Panama ranks 67th of 185 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Panama |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Panama |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Panama |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Chile or Panama?
- Panama, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Chile and Panama?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Panama?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Panama rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Chile ranks 68th and Panama ranks 67th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.