China vs Namibia: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
China
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Namibia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
China rank
88th
Namibia rank
90th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- China
- Namibia
How they compare
China currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Namibia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Namibia ahead.
China ranks 88th and Namibia ranks 90th of 185 countries.
Namibia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0004 ha per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, China or Namibia?
- China, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Namibia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between China and Namibia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Namibia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China and Namibia rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- China ranks 88th and Namibia ranks 90th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.