China vs Somalia: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
China
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Somalia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
China rank
88th
Somalia rank
89th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- China
- Somalia
How they compare
China currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Somalia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes China's figure about 1.1 times Somalia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Somalia ahead.
China ranks 88th and Somalia ranks 89th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, China averaged higher in 1 and Somalia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Somalia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Somalia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Somalia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | China |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Somalia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, China or Somalia?
- China, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Somalia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between China and Somalia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with China ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Somalia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do China and Somalia rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- China ranks 88th and Somalia ranks 89th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.