Czechia vs Iraq: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Czechia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Iraq
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Czechia rank
106th
Iraq rank
104th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Czechia
- Iraq
How they compare
Iraq currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Czechia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Iraq's figure about 2.5 times Czechia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 32 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Iraq ahead.
Czechia ranks 106th and Iraq ranks 104th of 185 countries.
Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Iraq | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Iraq |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Czechia or Iraq?
- Iraq, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Czechia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Czechia and Iraq?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Iraq ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Iraq?
- 32 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2024.
- How do Czechia and Iraq rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Czechia ranks 106th and Iraq ranks 104th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.