Denmark vs France: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Denmark
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
France
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Denmark rank
112th
France rank
110th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Denmark
- France
How they compare
France currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Denmark, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was France ahead.
Denmark ranks 112th and France ranks 110th of 185 countries.
France has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Denmark | France | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | France |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | France |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | France |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | France |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Denmark or France?
- France, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Denmark as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Denmark and France?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with France ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and France?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Denmark and France rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Denmark ranks 112th and France ranks 110th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.