Estonia vs Lithuania: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Estonia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Lithuania
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Estonia rank
112th
Lithuania rank
112th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Estonia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Lithuania, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lithuania ahead.
Estonia ranks 112th and Lithuania ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Lithuania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Estonia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Estonia or Lithuania?
- Estonia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Lithuania as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Estonia and Lithuania?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Lithuania?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Estonia and Lithuania rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Estonia ranks 112th and Lithuania ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.