Gabon vs Zimbabwe: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Gabon
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Zimbabwe
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Gabon rank
25th
Zimbabwe rank
24th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Gabon
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Gabon, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Gabon's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.
Gabon ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 185 countries.
Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gabon | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0002 ha per US$ of GDP | Zimbabwe |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | 0.0001 ha per US$ of GDP | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Gabon or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Gabon as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Gabon and Zimbabwe?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Zimbabwe?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Gabon and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Gabon ranks 25th and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.