Guatemala vs Liberia: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Guatemala
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Liberia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Guatemala rank
55th
Liberia rank
53rd
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Guatemala
- Liberia
How they compare
Liberia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Guatemala, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 13 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guatemala ahead.
Guatemala ranks 55th and Liberia ranks 53rd of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 2 and Liberia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guatemala | Liberia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Liberia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Guatemala |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Guatemala |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Liberia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Guatemala or Liberia?
- Liberia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Guatemala as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Guatemala and Liberia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Liberia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Liberia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Guatemala and Liberia rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Guatemala ranks 55th and Liberia ranks 53rd of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.