Iceland vs Panama: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Iceland
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Panama
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Iceland rank
70th
Panama rank
67th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Iceland
- Panama
How they compare
Panama currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Iceland, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Panama's figure about 1.5 times Iceland's.
Across all 35 years both countries report, Panama has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 70th and Panama ranks 67th of 185 countries.
Panama has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Panama | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Panama |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Panama |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Panama |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Panama |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Iceland or Panama?
- Panama, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Iceland as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Iceland and Panama?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Panama ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Panama?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Iceland and Panama rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Iceland ranks 70th and Panama ranks 67th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.