Ireland vs Latvia: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Ireland
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Ireland rank
112th
Latvia rank
112th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Ireland
- Latvia
How they compare
Ireland currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Latvia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Ireland ranks 112th and Latvia ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Ireland averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ireland | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Ireland |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Ireland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Ireland or Latvia?
- Ireland, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Ireland and Latvia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Ireland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ireland and Latvia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Ireland and Latvia rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Ireland ranks 112th and Latvia ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.