Italy vs Malaysia: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Italy
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Malaysia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Italy rank
100th
Malaysia rank
98th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Italy
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Italy, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Malaysia ahead.
Italy ranks 100th and Malaysia ranks 98th of 185 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 1 and Malaysia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Malaysia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Malaysia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Italy |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Italy or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Italy as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Italy and Malaysia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Malaysia?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Italy and Malaysia rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Italy ranks 100th and Malaysia ranks 98th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.