Latvia vs Uzbekistan: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Uzbekistan
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia rank
112th
Uzbekistan rank
112th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Uzbekistan
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Uzbekistan, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 112th and Uzbekistan ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Uzbekistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Latvia or Uzbekistan?
- Latvia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Uzbekistan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Latvia and Uzbekistan?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Uzbekistan?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Uzbekistan rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 112th and Uzbekistan ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.