Mauritius vs Norway: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Mauritius
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Norway
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Mauritius rank
112th
Norway rank
112th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Mauritius
- Norway
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Norway, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 112th and Norway ranks 112th of 185 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Norway | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Mauritius |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Mauritius or Norway?
- Mauritius, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Mauritius and Norway?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Norway?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Norway rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Mauritius ranks 112th and Norway ranks 112th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.