Nepal vs Rwanda: Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP
Nepal
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Rwanda
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Nepal rank
38th
Rwanda rank
40th
Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP over time
- Nepal
- Rwanda
How they compare
Nepal currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Rwanda, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Nepal's figure about 1.1 times Rwanda's.
The two have swapped places 14 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Nepal ahead.
Nepal ranks 38th and Rwanda ranks 40th of 185 countries.
Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nepal | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp, Nepal or Rwanda?
- Nepal, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Rwanda as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp between Nepal and Rwanda?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Nepal ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nepal and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Nepal and Rwanda rank globally for savanna — burned area, per unit of gdp?
- Nepal ranks 38th and Rwanda ranks 40th of 185 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burned Area, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Savanna — Burned Area divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.