Eastern Europe vs Equatorial Guinea: Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

Eastern Europe
-1 % change on previous year
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea
117.14 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eastern Europe rank
21st
Equatorial Guinea rank
24th

Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • Eastern Europe
  • Equatorial Guinea
-1000100200199120072024

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 117.14 % change on previous year against -1 % change on previous year in Eastern Europe, a difference of 118.14 % change on previous year.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 116.9 times Eastern Europe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 7 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Eastern Europe ranks 21st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 24th of 32 groups.

Across the 2 decades both report, Eastern Europe averaged higher in 1 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eastern Europe Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s -14.76 % change on previous year -16.67 % change on previous year 1.91 % change on previous year Eastern Europe
2020s -1 % change on previous year 117.14 % change on previous year 118.14 % change on previous year Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual, Eastern Europe or Equatorial Guinea?
Equatorial Guinea, at 117.14 % change on previous year against -1 % change on previous year in Eastern Europe as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual between Eastern Europe and Equatorial Guinea?
118.14 % change on previous year, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eastern Europe and Equatorial Guinea?
7 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Eastern Europe and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual?
Eastern Europe ranks 21st and Equatorial Guinea ranks 24th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eastern Europe vs Equatorial Guinea: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/eastern-europe/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/eastern-europe/equatorial-guinea/">Eastern Europe vs Equatorial Guinea: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 5,618 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.