Iceland vs Lesotho: Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual
Iceland
-100 % change on previous year
in 2023
Lesotho
-100 % change on previous year
in 2002
Iceland rank
124th
Lesotho rank
124th
Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time
- Iceland
- Lesotho
How they compare
Iceland currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Lesotho, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Lesotho has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 124th and Lesotho ranks 124th of 175 countries.
Lesotho has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual, Iceland or Lesotho?
- Iceland, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Lesotho as of 2023.
- What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual between Iceland and Lesotho?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Lesotho?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Iceland and Lesotho rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual?
- Iceland ranks 124th and Lesotho ranks 124th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.