Israel vs Mauritius: Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual
Israel
-100 % change on previous year
in 2011
Mauritius
-100 % change on previous year
in 2013
Israel rank
124th
Mauritius rank
124th
Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time
- Israel
- Mauritius
How they compare
Israel currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Mauritius, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Mauritius has been ahead every year.
Israel ranks 124th and Mauritius ranks 124th of 175 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual, Israel or Mauritius?
- Israel, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Mauritius as of 2011.
- What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual between Israel and Mauritius?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Israel and Mauritius?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Israel and Mauritius rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual?
- Israel ranks 124th and Mauritius ranks 124th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.