Middle Africa vs New Zealand: Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

Middle Africa
11.85 % change on previous year
in 2024
New Zealand
325.43 % change on previous year
in 2024
Middle Africa rank
13th
New Zealand rank
11th

Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • Middle Africa
  • New Zealand
-2000200400199120072024

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 325.43 % change on previous year against 11.85 % change on previous year in Middle Africa, a difference of 313.58 % change on previous year.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 27.5 times Middle Africa's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1991 it was New Zealand ahead.

Middle Africa ranks 13th and New Zealand ranks 11th of 32 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Middle Africa averaged higher in 2 and New Zealand in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle Africa New Zealand Difference Ahead
1990s -8.28 % change on previous year -23.23 % change on previous year 14.95 % change on previous year Middle Africa
2000s 2.28 % change on previous year -40.76 % change on previous year 43.05 % change on previous year Middle Africa
2010s -2.58 % change on previous year 72.15 % change on previous year 74.73 % change on previous year New Zealand
2020s 0.6598 % change on previous year 58.02 % change on previous year 57.36 % change on previous year New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual, Middle Africa or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 325.43 % change on previous year against 11.85 % change on previous year in Middle Africa as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual between Middle Africa and New Zealand?
313.58 % change on previous year, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle Africa and New Zealand?
25 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do Middle Africa and New Zealand rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual?
Middle Africa ranks 13th and New Zealand ranks 11th of 32 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle Africa vs New Zealand: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/middle-africa/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/middle-africa/new-zealand/">Middle Africa vs New Zealand: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 5,618 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.