Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Sweden: Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual
Saint Kitts and Nevis
-100 % change on previous year
in 2011
Sweden
-100 % change on previous year
in 2019
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
124th
Sweden rank
124th
Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time
- Saint Kitts and Nevis
- Sweden
How they compare
Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden, a difference of 0 % change on previous year.
Across all 6 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 124th and Sweden ranks 124th of 175 countries.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual, Saint Kitts and Nevis or Sweden?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis, at -100 % change on previous year against -100 % change on previous year in Sweden as of 2011.
- What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden?
- 0 % change on previous year, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 1996.
- How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Sweden rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual?
- Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 124th and Sweden ranks 124th of 175 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.