United Republic of Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual

United Republic of Tanzania
-13.42 % change on previous year
in 2024
Zimbabwe
-12.93 % change on previous year
in 2024
United Republic of Tanzania rank
75th
Zimbabwe rank
73rd

Savanna: Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry) … annual over time

  • United Republic of Tanzania
  • Zimbabwe
-1000100200300199120072024

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports -12.93 % change on previous year against -13.42 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania, a difference of 0.49 % change on previous year.

The two have swapped places 16 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

United Republic of Tanzania ranks 75th and Zimbabwe ranks 73rd of 175 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, United Republic of Tanzania averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade United Republic of Tanzania Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s -1.41 % change on previous year 31.71 % change on previous year 33.12 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2000s 7.79 % change on previous year -13.45 % change on previous year 21.25 % change on previous year United Republic of Tanzania
2010s -2.26 % change on previous year 2 % change on previous year 4.26 % change on previous year Zimbabwe
2020s -7.52 % change on previous year 10.31 % change on previous year 17.83 % change on previous year Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual, United Republic of Tanzania or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at -12.93 % change on previous year against -13.42 % change on previous year in United Republic of Tanzania as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual between United Republic of Tanzania and Zimbabwe?
0.49 % change on previous year, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for United Republic of Tanzania and Zimbabwe?
34 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2024.
How do United Republic of Tanzania and Zimbabwe rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues (biomass burned, dry matter), annual?
United Republic of Tanzania ranks 75th and Zimbabwe ranks 73rd of 175 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

United Republic of Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 October 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/united-republic-of-tanzania/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-annual-growth-rate/united-republic-of-tanzania/zimbabwe/">United Republic of Tanzania vs Zimbabwe: Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
207 places, 5,618 data points, 1991–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.