Australia and New Zealand vs South America: Savanna — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
18.20 million t
in 2024
South America
117.93 million t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
10th
South America rank
9th

Savanna — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • South America
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M199020072024

How they compare

South America currently reports 117.93 million t against 18.20 million t in Australia and New Zealand, a difference of 99.73 million t.

That makes South America's figure about 6.5 times Australia and New Zealand's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was South America ahead.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 10th and South America ranks 9th of 221 countries.

South America has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand South America Difference Ahead
1990s 52.12 million t 87.57 million t 35.44 million t South America
2000s 42.12 million t 108.77 million t 66.65 million t South America
2010s 32.60 million t 102.41 million t 69.81 million t South America
2020s 22.25 million t 104.92 million t 82.67 million t South America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or South America?
South America, at 117.93 million t against 18.20 million t in Australia and New Zealand as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and South America?
99.73 million t, with South America ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and South America?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and South America rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 10th and South America ranks 9th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs South America: Savanna — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/south-america/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/south-america/">Australia and New Zealand vs South America: Savanna — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.