Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Savanna — Burning crop residues

Australia and New Zealand
18.20 million t
in 2024
Timor-Leste
11,308 t
in 2024
Australia and New Zealand rank
10th
Timor-Leste rank
13th

Savanna — Burning crop residues over time

  • Australia and New Zealand
  • Timor-Leste
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M199020072024

How they compare

Australia and New Zealand currently reports 18.20 million t against 11,308 t in Timor-Leste, a difference of 18.19 million t.

That makes Australia and New Zealand's figure about 1,609.2 times Timor-Leste's.

Across all 35 years both countries report, Australia and New Zealand has been ahead every year.

Australia and New Zealand ranks 10th and Timor-Leste ranks 13th of 221 countries.

Australia and New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia and New Zealand Timor-Leste Difference Ahead
1990s 52.12 million t 21,684 t 52.10 million t Australia and New Zealand
2000s 42.12 million t 59,247 t 42.06 million t Australia and New Zealand
2010s 32.60 million t 26,671 t 32.57 million t Australia and New Zealand
2020s 22.25 million t 9,463 t 22.24 million t Australia and New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues, Australia and New Zealand or Timor-Leste?
Australia and New Zealand, at 18.20 million t against 11,308 t in Timor-Leste as of 2024.
What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues between Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
18.19 million t, with Australia and New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste?
35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
How do Australia and New Zealand and Timor-Leste rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues?
Australia and New Zealand ranks 10th and Timor-Leste ranks 13th of 221 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Savanna — Burning crop residues. Statizoid, drawing on Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/timor-leste-2/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://climate.statizoid.com/compare/savanna-burning-crop-residues-biomass-burned-dry-matter-fao-tier-1/australia-and-new-zealand/timor-leste-2/">Australia and New Zealand vs Timor-Leste: Savanna — Burning crop residues</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter)
Unit
t
Source
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
Licence
CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO (FAO)
Coverage
274 places, 9,364 data points, 1990–2024
Last refreshed

The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.