Barbados vs Latvia: Savanna — Burning crop residues
Barbados
0 t
in 2024
Latvia
0 t
in 2024
Barbados rank
119th
Latvia rank
119th
Savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Barbados
- Latvia
How they compare
Barbados currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Latvia, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Latvia ahead.
Barbados ranks 119th and Latvia ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Barbados | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.16 t | 355.97 t | 350.8 t | Latvia |
| 2000s | 0 t | 1,565 t | 1,565 t | Latvia |
| 2010s | 14.97 t | 433.41 t | 418.44 t | Latvia |
| 2020s | 29.94 t | 0 t | 29.94 t | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues, Barbados or Latvia?
- Barbados, at 0 t against 0 t in Latvia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues between Barbados and Latvia?
- 0 t, with Barbados ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Latvia?
- 33 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Barbados and Latvia rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues?
- Barbados ranks 119th and Latvia ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.