Belgium vs Sweden: Savanna — Burning crop residues
Belgium
0 t
in 2024
Sweden
0 t
in 2024
Belgium rank
119th
Sweden rank
119th
Savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Belgium
- Sweden
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0 t against 0 t in Sweden, a difference of 0 t.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Sweden ahead.
Belgium ranks 119th and Sweden ranks 119th of 221 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 114.82 t | 79.74 t | 35.08 t | Belgium |
| 2010s | 194.32 t | 1,638 t | 1,444 t | Sweden |
| 2020s | 106 t | 0 t | 106 t | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues, Belgium or Sweden?
- Belgium, at 0 t against 0 t in Sweden as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues between Belgium and Sweden?
- 0 t, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sweden?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Belgium and Sweden rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues?
- Belgium ranks 119th and Sweden ranks 119th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.