Chile vs Rwanda: Savanna — Burning crop residues
Chile
76,480 t
in 2024
Rwanda
89,526 t
in 2024
Chile rank
62nd
Rwanda rank
60th
Savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Chile
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 89,526 t against 76,480 t in Chile, a difference of 13,046 t.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 62nd and Rwanda ranks 60th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 40,056 t | 49,230 t | 9,175 t | Rwanda |
| 2000s | 33,911 t | 29,020 t | 4,890 t | Chile |
| 2010s | 115,794 t | 32,076 t | 83,719 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 81,647 t | 61,764 t | 19,883 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues, Chile or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 89,526 t against 76,480 t in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues between Chile and Rwanda?
- 13,046 t, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Rwanda?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Rwanda rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues?
- Chile ranks 62nd and Rwanda ranks 60th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.