Chile vs Suriname: Savanna — Burning crop residues
Chile
76,480 t
in 2024
Suriname
90,290 t
in 2024
Chile rank
62nd
Suriname rank
59th
Savanna — Burning crop residues over time
- Chile
- Suriname
How they compare
Suriname currently reports 90,290 t against 76,480 t in Chile, a difference of 13,810 t.
That makes Suriname's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 62nd and Suriname ranks 59th of 221 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Suriname in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Suriname | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 40,056 t | 24,361 t | 15,695 t | Chile |
| 2000s | 33,911 t | 44,230 t | 10,319 t | Suriname |
| 2010s | 115,794 t | 39,851 t | 75,943 t | Chile |
| 2020s | 81,647 t | 36,818 t | 44,829 t | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher savanna — burning crop residues, Chile or Suriname?
- Suriname, at 90,290 t against 76,480 t in Chile as of 2024.
- What is the difference in savanna — burning crop residues between Chile and Suriname?
- 13,810 t, with Suriname ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Suriname?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Chile and Suriname rank globally for savanna — burning crop residues?
- Chile ranks 62nd and Suriname ranks 59th of 221 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, published as Savanna — Burning crop residues (Biomass burned, dry matter). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The FAOSTAT domain on Emissions from Fires consists of estimates of methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O) and carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions generated from biomass burning in a range of vegetation types and from fires in organic soils.